diziler the society diziler the boys

Some sections are frankly polemical in nature. The authors reserve the right to the original interpretation of classical works, although sometimes their interpretations seem too paradoxical. This can be said about the essays written by O. Musienko and O. Sydor-Ghibelinda.

The cinema of independent Ukraine becomes the object of research by I. Zubavina. It must be said that the author set himself a difficult task: the material, one might say, is still pulsating, having "not stood up" in numerous studies. But the author decently overcomes these difficulties, singling out the most noticeable and expressive tendencies manifested in film productions created at domestic studios. I. Zubavina observes how the breath of time changes the aesthetics of national cinema, how painfully these changes sometimes occur, but the author does not doubt their regularity and necessity.

The intelligence of R. Roslyak and O. Bezruchka logically complement each other. Dovzhenko's pedagogical activity has been studied surprisingly little, especially when it comes to the director's laboratory on the basis of the Kyiv Film Factory. Here we can talk about the opening of fundamentally new pages in the creative biography of an outstanding film artist.