diziler the driver diziler diziler moon knight

In the second half of the 70s- the first half of the 80sfilmmakers are trying to understandVietnamese tragedy. INa genius forever remained in the treasury of the world cinematographyepisode - flightAmerican x helicopters to the music of "Flight of the Valkyries" fromoperas by R. Wagner"Ring of the Nibelung" ,which symbolizes impendinginevitable tragedy.In the specified period, the genre palette of American cinema was enriched.Simultaneously with melodramas, newa kind of action movie ("Superman" by R. Zonner, "Konai,barbarian" by J. Milius), ironic comedies ("Interiors ", "Manhattan" by V. Allen andetc.) onpolitical tapes appear on the screens ("Justice for all"S. Pollak), space films("Star Wars" by J. Lucas") and others.A special place in the US film arts of the second half of the 70s and early 80ssit for yearsfilms that make sense of the phenomenon of the film and television industry and the fate of people who were associated with themown life.

This film forever engraved the director's name in the list of outstanding artists20th century worldcinematography In front of it, F. F. Coppola, U.Friedkin, S. Lumet and others.Thematic update by Gollywood was conditioned by the need forchanging the hero. Yes, inthe second half of the 60s -in the first half of the 70s appear on the screen like thiscalled antiheroes. Unlikelegendary x handsome men, "knights without fear"reproach" of the 30s,new heroes havecertainhuman weaknesses, but under any conditions they do not lose their sense of self-worth. Such imagesembodied by outstanding actors, known to the whole world as the brilliant Hollywood four - D. Hoffman,R. De Niro, J. Nicholson, Al Pacino.Al Pacino, outstandingAmerican and actorof Italian origin, pupil of the Higherschool of performing arts of TV, organically combines work in the theater in its activitiesand cinema.However, the worldwide fame of Al Pacinoidentified with cinema.

In some texts, the authors focus not so much on the film process as on its historical and social context. Thus, Z. Alfyorova draws attention to those general civilizational conflicts that were related to Ukraine and Ukrainian culture even in Soviet times. The author examines the artistic culture of Ukraine at the intersection of the influences of economic, political and socio-cultural systems and observes how the "crisis of reality", the "replacement of reality with signs of reality" is provoked both by the influence of "official" Soviet culture and the phenomena of early postmodernism. The author rightly notes that the internal dissidence of a certain circle of Ukrainian artists is reflected in the very style of screen works. However, interesting observations and theoretical generalizations do not always find concrete confirmation in the direct examination of the film process.