diziler miss scarlet and the duke diziler we own this city

The cinema of independent Ukraine becomes the object of research by I. Zubavina. It must be said that the author set himself a difficult task: the material, one might say, is still pulsating, having "not stood up" in numerous studies. But the author decently overcomes these difficulties, singling out the most noticeable and expressive tendencies manifested in film productions created at domestic studios. I. Zubavina observes how the breath of time changes the aesthetics of national cinema, how painfully these changes sometimes occur, but the author does not doubt their regularity and necessity.

The release of the film M.Forman's "Amadeus" is a brilliant interpretation of creative and personal confrontationMozart and Salieri.In this decade, R. Redford, J. Lange, M.Strip - worthyinheritors of the great acting traditions of the US cinema.Significant gainsAmerican about cinemaof the last two decades are primarily associated with the names of F.F.Coppola (the third part of "The Godfather", "Bram Stoker's Dracula", etc.);S. Spielberg("Schindler's List ", "Jurassic Parkperiod" etc.); R.Zemeckis ("Forrest Gump"); D. Lynch("Blue Velvet ", "Your Shke", etc.).However, at the same time, many others appear on the screensthird-rate film production.Nowadays, almost all the modern ones are included in the Hollywood assembly linefilm genres tending tointeraction: a gangster movie –"Honor seven! Prizzi" by J. Hustonand "Married to the Mafia"J. Demmy (comedy invariance of the genre), "Oncein America" ​​S. Leone, "The WayCarlito"B. de Palma, "On the Crest of the Wave" by K. Biglow (with elements of drama); thriller - a synthesis of detective andhorror film - "Heart of an Angel" by A. Parker, "Silence of the Lambs" by J. Demmy, "Cape Fear" by M.

The 1960s and 1970s were rich in monographic publications, which covered specific problems of domestic cinema. In the 70s, the works of I. Kornienko "Half a century of Ukrainian Soviet cinema" (1970), "Cinema of Soviet Ukraine" (1975) were published. The appearance of these books made it possible to create an academic history of Ukrainian cinema. Of the planned three volumes, only two were published. And there was a certain regularity in this. The fast-moving course of events, the change in social attitudes made the third volume obsolete already in the manuscript. Did this mean the rewriting of history, about which some learned men lamented? Probably not. It's just that history began to reveal its secrets, which had been carefully hidden for a long time. And artistic phenomena, accompanied, it would seem, by a fixed look, suddenly appear in their other renewed quality.