A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z #

Site adresimiz diizibox.online olmuştur. Sürekli güncel adrese erişmek için dizibox.com alan adını kullanınız.

Beklenen / Eklenen Diziler

diziler lunatics diziler we own this city

The cinema of independent Ukraine becomes the object of research by I. Zubavina. It must be said that the author set himself a difficult task: the material, one might say, is still pulsating, having "not stood up" in numerous studies. But the author decently overcomes these difficulties, singling out the most noticeable and expressive tendencies manifested in film productions created at domestic studios. I. Zubavina observes how the breath of time changes the aesthetics of national cinema, how painfully these changes sometimes occur, but the author does not doubt their regularity and necessity.

That is why, when studying the cinematography of the 1930s, two important aspects should be taken into account: the social one, which prevailed in the cinematography of the Soviet period, German cinema and the cinematography of the United States, and the ontological one, which gave an impetus to the understanding of the processes that took place in the French cinematography of the specified period.

Ukrainian cinematography was started way back in 1896, more than 125 years ago. The first film was shot by Alfred Fedetsky in Kharkiv in 1896, but it was not like the cinema we are used to. The tape was entitled "Transfer of the Miraculous Icon of the Mother of God from the Kuryaz Monastery to the Kharkiv Pokrovsky Monastery." She (title) immediately describes the plot of this two-minute long work. Thanks to this tape, A. Fedetskyi became the first Ukrainian cameraman of documentary films. A little later in the same year, he organized the first public screening for Ukraine, where he demonstrated three-minute documentary stories. At the same time, screenings of French films started in Lviv.

Popüler Dizilerden Son Bölümler

Tümünü Gör

The concept of film genre began to take shape with the establishment of the Hollywood studio system. It helped systematize the production of films and facilitated their promotion to the market. Each studio specialized in the production of films of a certain genre: Paramount Pictures produced comedies, Universal Studios - horror films, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer - musicals, etc. At the same time, some directors and actors began to associate the audience with specific genres of movies: director Alfred Hitchcock — with thrillers, Jeffrey Ford — with westerns, Douglas Sirk — with melodramas, Wes Craven and Lamberto Vava — with horror films, John By — with action films , Roland Emmerich — with disaster films.

The release of the film M.Forman's "Amadeus" is a brilliant interpretation of creative and personal confrontationMozart and Salieri.In this decade, R. Redford, J. Lange, M.Strip - worthyinheritors of the great acting traditions of the US cinema.Significant gainsAmerican about cinemaof the last two decades are primarily associated with the names of F.F.Coppola (the third part of "The Godfather", "Bram Stoker's Dracula", etc.);S. Spielberg("Schindler's List ", "Jurassic Parkperiod" etc.); R.Zemeckis ("Forrest Gump"); D. Lynch("Blue Velvet ", "Your Shke", etc.).However, at the same time, many others appear on the screensthird-rate film production.Nowadays, almost all the modern ones are included in the Hollywood assembly linefilm genres tending tointeraction: a gangster movie –"Honor seven! Prizzi" by J. Hustonand "Married to the Mafia"J. Demmy (comedy invariance of the genre), "Oncein America" S. Leone, "The WayCarlito"B. de Palma, "On the Crest of the Wave" by K. Biglow (with elements of drama); thriller - a synthesis of detective andhorror film - "Heart of an Angel" by A. Parker, "Silence of the Lambs" by J. Demmy, "Cape Fear" by M.