diziler hunters diziler diziler yakamoz s 245

The release of the film M.Forman's "Amadeus" is a brilliant interpretation of creative and personal confrontationMozart and Salieri.In this decade, R. Redford, J. Lange, M.Strip - worthyinheritors of the great acting traditions of the US cinema.Significant gainsAmerican about cinemaof the last two decades are primarily associated with the names of F.F.Coppola (the third part of "The Godfather", "Bram Stoker's Dracula", etc.);S. Spielberg("Schindler's List ", "Jurassic Parkperiod" etc.); R.Zemeckis ("Forrest Gump"); D. Lynch("Blue Velvet ", "Your Shke", etc.).However, at the same time, many others appear on the screensthird-rate film production.Nowadays, almost all the modern ones are included in the Hollywood assembly linefilm genres tending tointeraction: a gangster movie –"Honor seven! Prizzi" by J. Hustonand "Married to the Mafia"J. Demmy (comedy invariance of the genre), "Oncein America" ​​S. Leone, "The WayCarlito"B. de Palma, "On the Crest of the Wave" by K. Biglow (with elements of drama); thriller - a synthesis of detective andhorror film - "Heart of an Angel" by A. Parker, "Silence of the Lambs" by J. Demmy, "Cape Fear" by M.

Despite the crisis of the US economy in the 1930s, the American cinematography of this period experienced the highest rise and prosperity - its "golden age". The viewer wanted to watch movies more than ever. This unexpected, at first glance, situation was explained quite simply. Along with exquisite elitist paintings by J. Ford (1895-1974) "The Grapes of Wrath", "Young Mr. Lincoln", W. Wyler (1902-1981) "The Dead Corner", "The Foxes", O. Wells (1915-1985) " Citizen Kane", which admired for its innovation in the field of drama, in the system of expressive means, stunned with its psychological depth and social significance, commercial genres are becoming widespread: gangster films, horror films, melodramas, musicals, westerns, etc. So, American cinema of the 1930s performed a certain compensatory function, distracting the viewer from life's problems.

The 1960s and 1970s were rich in monographic publications, which covered specific problems of domestic cinema. In the 70s, the works of I. Kornienko "Half a century of Ukrainian Soviet cinema" (1970), "Cinema of Soviet Ukraine" (1975) were published. The appearance of these books made it possible to create an academic history of Ukrainian cinema. Of the planned three volumes, only two were published. And there was a certain regularity in this. The fast-moving course of events, the change in social attitudes made the third volume obsolete already in the manuscript. Did this mean the rewriting of history, about which some learned men lamented? Probably not. It's just that history began to reveal its secrets, which had been carefully hidden for a long time. And artistic phenomena, accompanied, it would seem, by a fixed look, suddenly appear in their other renewed quality.